The countrywide or tribal political will that puts current technology and generation to work, seeks to manipulate financial employment for the hundreds and maintain a defense shape to make certain the continuation of political electricity. This can be accomplished in the call of democracy, plutocracy, dictatorship, faith, monarchies, and so on. All vie to broaden emotional thoughts manage spin-aesthetics to persuade their topics that they are higher off than their competitor nations or tribes. It follows that the concept of one international government should constitute a threat to such numerous mind manage structures. However, it is viable to override this subject by means of the use of rigorous technological know-how to expand a sustainable clinical code of ethics, designed in particular to manual civilization right into a country of perpetual global peace in place of perpetual struggle. The handiest element stopping this to occur is science itself.
As the entire potential of nanotechnology emerges, countries with nuclear guns at their disposal will begin to understand that they will quickly be now not blanketed with the aid of them. It is apparent that futuristic nano-machines can be able to mass produce undetectable nano-weapons of mass destruction and there are lots of willing zealots who could be significantly honored to apply them in opposition to civilian populations. Some would possibly declare this to be a natural culling of humans on an overpopulated planet. There might be plenty of excessive-rating navy employees determined to apply nanotechnology to forestall the religious zealots. On the opposite hand, nanotechnology has the capability to create anything from very little, along with the development of food and water. Without a responsible science, the ones controlling nanotechnology will carry hell on this planet. However, with a accountable technological know-how to manual them to it, utopia is viable. In order to reap that utopia, the clinical will to create it must first exist.
The fanatic will to result in violent destruction isn’t restricted to religious zealots who inflict instantaneous entropic destruction upon innocent civilians. This fanatical will is fundamentally fundamental to nearly all noticeably skilled scientists as properly. The winning medical world-view’s desire to move civilians towards entropic destruction is just as fanatical, but it operates in a slower and greater organized way. Scientists need to recognize why that is an accurate depiction of the mainstream clinical attitude and to dissociate themselves from an internal compulsion to worship destructive chaos.
The Nobel Laureate Lord Bertrand Russell and Albert Einstein used arithmetic to convince themselves that people must worship chaos destruction. Russell’s most popular essay become entitled ‘A Freeman’s Worship’ in which he wrote that scientists have to be ruled by means of the physics regulation that Einstein called the most suitable law of all of the sciences, the law of usual chaos. At the very end, Russell wrote, all human innovative genius can be entirely destroyed within a universe in thermodynamic destroy. This fanatical attitude can’t be emotionally negated by means of human beings continually telling each different to have a glad day. The term for entropic human extinction, in nano-phrases, isn’t in any respect related to the long one that Russell and Einstein expected.
Arguing completely the opposite to the worshipping of Diabolic chaos, turned into the Platonic lifestyle of scientific philosophy that, at some stage in the third Century BC, created the ‘Science for Ethical Ends’. One might also properly ask, what makes Platonic common sense so important on this depend on human survival? The solution to that question is that Platonic logic defined ‘evil’ as destructive belonging of the unformed count in the physical atom, which could emerge to destroy civilization.
The equal mathematical common sense that expected this chance of nuclear destruction also applies to the misuse of nanotechnology. One may also then ask, who can you agree with to manual ennobling ethical government for the gain of all? Platonic ‘good’ became defined as being for the health of an endless universe. Therefore, the solution is that you could trust a scientific science based upon a sustainable endless evolutionary ethics. The next query arises, how will you find a limitless evolutionary ethic that capabilities for the fitness of the universe whilst contemporary mainstream physics prohibits it to exist?
The solution to that query is apparent. Nanotechnology has shown that the molecule of emotion located in 1972 by Dr. Candace Pert is a part of a complex dynamical fractal power machine extending its common sense to a normal infinity in contradiction to Russell and Einstein’s global-view. The molecule of emotion constantly upgrades the shape of the endocrine fluids preserving human fitness inside an evolving endless universe. That system is the basis of the emerging technology of quantum biology, which entangles with the energies of chaos to adapt human cognizance. Quantum biology tells us that it’s time to forestall worshipping the god of chaos that the ancient Greeks called Diabolos.
Buckminster Fuller used the Platonic ethical arithmetic to develop his synergistic model of the universe and the three 1996 Nobel laureates in chemistry named the basis of their new scientific technology as Fullerene Chemistry. Fuller wrote an ebook entitled ‘Utopia or Oblivion’ wherein he postulated that we have a desire to be ruled by means of the law of chaos or by way of the Platonic engineering principles of creation. To the non-scientist, this means dwelling in a universe governed via Platonic love.
From Fuller’s balanced energy attitude, derived directly from Platonic arithmetic, the important medical technology can be envisaged in which nano-generation may be guided by a moral Platonic Oath, upgrading the historical Hippocratic one, used in remedy these days. During the 18th and 19th Centuries, a Ph.D. in technology intended a doctorate in philosophy and the awesome philosophers of that point, who made the incredible electromagnetic discoveries, using the arithmetic belonging to the Platonic moral science to expand ethical electromagnetic physics. Any leading encyclopedia will give an explanation for that the discoverer of the electromagnetic field, Hans Christian Oersted, wrote his doctoral dissertation, based upon the electromagnetic ethics postulated via the philosopher of science Emmanuel Kant.