Dream World Science: We Will Need to Discard Materialism to Find a Theory of Everything


The hallmark of technological know-how is its willingness to discard outmoded theories when a higher, extra explanatory model comes alongside. But these days, technology practices this principle best in the paradigm of materialism. By this time period I suggest a model of the universe primarily based upon the assumption that count came before mind, that the universe and all residing matters are nothing however debris in movement, and that the world we see, from the suggestions of our hands to the farthest galaxy, exists independently of the thoughts and operates past its manage..


This materialistic model brings us the Big Bang concept, dark be counted, darkish electricity, reductive materialism, and the search for the “God” particle in atom smashers and for the origin of lifestyles in check tubes.

Modern scientists use the version of materialism due to the fact they agree with it’s far important to practice science. For example, in a classic article on quantum physics, entitled, “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?” the authors, Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen, write, “Any extreme consideration of a bodily theory should take into account the distinction between the goal truth, that is impartial of any theory, and the physical ideas with which the principle operates.”Science

The overdue Ernst Mayr, considered one of history’s main biologists, expressed the subject this way:

“Despite the openness of technology to new statistics and hypotheses, it have to be said that absolutely all scientists-incredibly like theologians-bring a set of what we call “first ideas” with them to the take a look at of the herbal international. One of these axiomatic assumptions is that there may be real world impartial of human perceptions. This might be known as the principle of objectivity (as opposed to subjectivity) or not unusual-experience realism. This does now not imply that person scientists are usually “goal” or even that objectivity among people is feasible in any absolute sense. What it does suggest is that an goal world exists out of doors of the have an effect on of subjective belief. Most scientists-even though now not all-believe in this axiom.”

Even though the objective-international version is a famous standpoint — since everybody wishes there to be a “real world impartial of human perceptions” — it does suffer from one great flaw: no person has ever shown it’s miles either proper or necessary. Indeed, no one has proven that technological know-how can not be practiced inside a different conceptual model. If there’s one grievance modern-day scientists deserve is that they’ve convinced the general public at big that handiest inside the materialistic version is the exercise of science possible; the usage of every other technique, they announce, veers off the road into unscientific non secular dogma and new-age hocus-pocus.

Another downside of the materialistic version is that it has compelled cutting-edge technology down a series of lifeless-stop streets as it tries to piece collectively a complete principle of the cosmos whilst being shackled through its own version. Here is a short listing of the conundrums cloth technological know-how now faces:

The beginning of the problem and power that exploded within the Big Bang
The mechanism for inflation
The supply of the legal guidelines of nature
The individual and existence of darkish remember and darkish electricity
The difficulty of reconciling the particle/wave duality of quantum physics with goal reality
The incompatibility between quantum physics and gravity
The starting place of existence and the DNA molecule
The foundation of focus
The way wherein nature’s legal guidelines seem pleasant-tuned in order that lifestyles can exist.
Despite these deep quandaries, current theorists supply no concept to the perception that the supply of the problem may not be their incomplete know-how of a mind-independent cloth global, but alternatively the very model of materialism.

Would scientists be willing to attempt a brand new model of the universe if it defined greater however made them discard lots of their materialistic-based totally theories? Or, are modern-day scientists so wedded to the version of materialism that they would instead exercise technology inside this comforting — but ultimately fake — model as opposed to strive some thing one-of-a-kind that could ultimately give an explanation for extra and lead to a better theoretical framework?

Suppose we took the view that rely emerged from mind in preference to the opposite manner around? If this opportunity point of view is in reality authentic, must we forget about the sector’s make-up and go on practising science best within the materialist model, or have to we as a minimum decide whether or not technology may be practiced in this mind-generated, dream International and see in which that leads us?

What is Science?

Science is commonly described as “any system of information that is worried with the physical global and its phenomena and that entails independent observations and systematic experimentation. In widespread, a science entails a “pursuit of know-how masking widespread truths or the operations of essential laws.” Empirical technological know-how,

“seeks to explore, to describe, to explain, and to are expecting the occurrences inside the world we live in. [Scientific] statements, therefore, need to be checked in opposition to the information of our experience, and they may be ideal most effective if they’re well supported with the aid of empirical evidence. Such evidence is acquired in lots of special methods: by experimentation, by systematic observations, through interviews, surveys, by way of psychological or clinical trying out, through careful examination of documents, inscriptions, coins, archaeological relics, and so on.”

Another feature of technological know-how is that seeks to grant herbal explanations for physical phenomena, in preference to supernatural or immeasurable, untestable, or unverifiable reasons. This function allows explain why scientists usually choose Darwin over Genesis for accounting for the variety of existence-forms present at the Earth: Darwin provided an evidence verifiable via statement; Genesis in reality says God did it, without explaining how. As we will, we will no longer need to discard any of those capabilities of technological know-how if we alternate to a mind-created or dream version of the cosmos.

Why the Independent World Assumption is False

There are numerous critical problems with materialism’s assumption of a thoughts-independent global. But whilst present day scientists display no hesitation in thinking theories and ideas framed in the materialist version (such as string concept, multi-universes, or the various-worlds interpretation of quantum physics), they by no means as soon as query the underlying assumption in their own materialistic version. This is the essential error of contemporary technological know-how.

The materialistic model is improbable for 3 fundamental reasons:

First, the history of philosophy teaches us a threshold reality about the mind that most people both ignore or have by no means concept approximately. This fact is that the thoughts is handiest able to knowing approximately itself. Even beneath the tenets of cutting-edge technological know-how snapshots of the (assumed) outside international in the long run from within the thoughts; due to the fact that we will handiest recognize the thoughts, we should expect that an impartial global exists out of doors of the thoughts that is the reason of the intellectual thoughts and images that form in the mind. Some view this question as a remember of sanity: how can someone without a doubt question whether a world outside the mind exists? But this framing of the question mis-states the difficulty: We may not be able to tell the difference if the mind, in place of passively receiving pictures of an external international as in Locke’s famous clean tablet, actively initiatives the external global like a grand, 3-D movie projector.

This precise question — can the mind recognise some thing other than itself — was the subject of one of the brilliant philosophical debates of all time, starting with the British empiricist John Locke and finishing with the metaphysics of David Hume, Immanuel Kant, G.W.F. Hegel, Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Friedrich W.J. Schelling, and others. Even although the analytical inquiry ended with really all of these thinkers concluding that the thoughts can most effective recognize itself, the project ended with both solipsism (the arena is all in my head) or a few shape of mysticism. Idealism changed into not able to solve the trouble of the a couple of dreamers: if the sector is a dream, then do we each live in our very own dream world?Materialism

If our whole medical worldview is based totally upon understanding about a mind unbiased global, when it is also real we cannot in reality recognize that global, then should no longer scientists at least showcase a piece extra humility when pronouncing their cutting-edge variations of the “theory of everything?” If, indeed, it is unalterably actual that the thoughts can most effective recognise itself, then we would want to increase a technology — a methodological gadget of thought — that accepts this precept as given?J

The second motive we must doubt materialism is an issue of not unusual experience and leads many humans to accept as true within a supernatural strength: wherein did all this intended “mind-independent” stuff come from? This very fundamental query is most at once presented inside the Big Bang idea, materialism’s version of a introduction story. Under that idea, what we now perceive because the universe of stars began in a fiery blast of be counted, area, and time more or less 14 billion years ago. To account for the trillions upon trillions of stars in the sky, scientists count on that at one time all of this remember became condensed right into a primordial seed, also referred to as a “singularity. ” To ask where all of the stuff that makes up the universe comes from is similar to asking where the primordial seed came from when you consider that both contain the equal quantity of remember and strength.

Material scientists have completed an impressive activity of avoiding this crucial weakness to the very basis of the scientific business enterprise. When driven, some scientists speak approximately “quantum fluctuations” — “vacuum energy”– however these theories themselves also count on a few kind of strength discipline, and maximum probably an looking at mind. Some scientists, which include Nobel prize-triumphing physicist, Leon Lederman, are more candid on the topic:

“A tale logically begins at the beginning. But this tale is ready the universe, and sadly there aren’t any facts for the Very Beginning. None, 0. We don’t know anything about the universe till it reaches the mature age of a billionth of a trillionth of a 2d, this is, a few very quick time after creation in the Big Bang. When you study or hear whatever abut the beginning of the universe, someone is making it up. We are in the realm of philosophy. Only God is aware of what happened at the Very Beginning[.]”

Coming up with a logical, credible explanation for how enough reply to beautify the heavens sprang from the darkish void is no easy undertaking, and close enough to impossible to in reality be impossible. And again, that fabric scientists don’t have any reason for how this miracle came about need to create extra humility on their element than it has.

The third cause to doubt seriously the independent global assumption of cloth technology issues the laws of nature. The fabric global, as we understand, follows specific and predictable legal guidelines, together with gravity, the legal guidelines of motion, power, gases, and chemistry, which are describable inside the language of arithmetic, constant and ordinary. But as soon as technology disconnects mind from be counted, this mind, the handiest smart pressure in the universe over which we have direct expertise, can provide rely no assist in arranging itself into the legal guidelines of nature. The quest for the source of the laws of nature — or the source of mathematical constancy — stays considered one of technology’s best challenges.

The Independent World Assumption Leads Scientists Astray

It can be visible that many of technological know-how’s greater weird theories end result from its adherence to a materialistic conception of truth. It is as if any twist or contortion to a concept is permissible so long as it’s far framed within the cloth technological know-how worldview. This exercise truly perpetuates a foundational blunders.

In a few theories, inclusive of the Big Bang theory, material scientists truely anticipate the vital (close to-limitless) quantity of count number and strength to fill out the principle. But different theories show how scientists come upon multi-layered puzzles when, after having made the impartial-world assumption, they then use it to explain other phenomena. For instance, one outcome of the same old Big Bang model is that scientists don’t have any credible explanation — apart from undeniable twist of fate — for why the wildly chaotic Big Bang led to a universe this is almost absolutely flat; specially a universe in which the repulsive force from the Big Bang exactly cancels out the attractive force of the exploding stellar debris (the “flatness problem”). Nor does the same old Big Bang model explain why vastly separate areas of outer area have exactly the equal temperature, whilst there’s no physical method for the separate regions to have shared facts. (the “horizon problem.”) Rather than view those essential problems in their theories as rooted inside the pointless impartial-global assumption, fabric scientists use them as motives to plan extra complex theories requiring extra ad-hoc assumptions.

Thus, their way to the crucial problems inside the trendy Big Bang model is the inflationary Big Bang theory. With this convenient amendment, the universe just so occurred to inflate by a thing of 10E51(the wide variety 10 with 51 zeros after it) in 10E-36 seconds — and then paused to song the everyday growth of the universe anticipated by the Big Bang. This wild enlargement came about in an unimaginably quick time — one-billionth of the time it takes light to go the space of an atomic nucleus. Inflation permits scientists to preserve the materialist version through the usage of a wildly speculative, advert hot idea as the answer to the flatness and horizon troubles.

Of course if scientists did no longer make the unbiased international assumption in the first region they might haven’t any need to make subjects worse through resorting to the unrestrained hypothesis of the inflationary universe version.

A first rate characteristic of nature is that its laws seem finely tuned in order that lifestyles can exist. This statement, recognised generally as the anthropic precept, strongly suggests that “some thing goes on:” the deeper scientists delve into the essential constants of the physical global, the more it seems as though some force became the dials to the correct settings just so lifestyles can exist.

To escape the mystical overtones of the anthropic principle, some scientists (maximum significantly Stephen Hawking and Leonard Mlodinow of their e-book, The Grand Design) have advanced theories which expect that inflation brought on no longer one but 10E500 universes to spring from the void. (Of, route, so far we’ve got located firm evidence for simplest this type of many universes, which appears to be sufficient.) In one of these a couple of universes, the authors provide an explanation for, the legal guidelines of nature might have became out just so lifestyles can exist. But, once more, if the one universe we see is in truth mind-created, we would haven’t any need to postulate the lifestyles of 10E500 different ones to provide an explanation for the bizarre match among people and the universe.

Another instance of ways the independent-world assumption creates untold problems for fabric science theory comes from the sphere of biology and worries the beginning of existence. Having disconnected mind from count number of their theories, fabric scientists are left to invest how senseless residue from the Big Bang arranged itself into elaborate workings of residing cellular, together with the codes of the DNA molecule.

According to Occam’s razor, the fewer assumptions in a principle the better the idea. Would not then a theory that defined the sector with out making the unbiased global assumption be a higher concept than one that does make the idea?

Science is supposed to be the emotionally detached search for fact. If a higher concept came alongside that controlled to give an explanation for the physical phenomena of the sector with out the independent global assumption of cloth technology, would not this theory as a minimum deserve a look? In unique words, if the metaphysical assumption of material science isn’t actual, it would be vital to re-work a lot of its theories, however it’d now not eliminate the sphere of technology. Instead it would re-orient technology upon a more potent footing, at the same time as also becoming a member of the field of technological know-how with philosophy and faith.

Material technology is like an extremely sluggish, diligent portrait artist who insists that his version stay perfectly still in the course of the prolonged consultation; to capture the moment, the artist, like material science, ought to anticipate the version is unbiased of the artist’s innovative powers; he’s portray a discern of the natural global; constant, self-sustaining; independent. In the identical way, scientists objectify the bodily international because they trust doing so is necessary to examine it.

In summary, fabric scientists assume the independence and objectivity of the herbal international (e.G., stars, planets, residing bodies) to have a look at its composition, actions, and records, and there take a look at consequences indeed show the unchanging nature of the physical global.

Science Remains the Best Approach for Finding Truth in a Mind-Generated World.

But each of those elements of scientific know-how stay in area if the supply of the external world is the united mind in preference to some mysterious, power-producing outside pressure (something triggered the Big Bang in keeping with the advent concept of fabric technological know-how.) Scientists can nevertheless assume the impartial existence of outside objects a good way to look at them. They can nevertheless calculate the regularity of the planetary orbits; falling projectiles; spiraling galaxies; electrical forces; gasoline pressures; chemical reactions; quantum mechanics; and truly each other bodily pressure or existence method. But in the long run the picture they draw is a self-portrait. What changes is certainly our perspective and the intensity of our understanding.

Of route, viewing the world as a dream or mind-created will regulate positive theories of present-day science however it’ll not trade the fundamental reason of technological know-how that’s to explain the workings of the physical International in line with coherent theories. In the end, motives of the lifestyles and regularity of the outside international cause the mind because the closing purpose, however it does not change the essential assignment of cataloguing the regularities of nature.

Science in a Dream

If the universe we stay in is certainly a dream, then there’s no doubt that some theories of current science will want to be overturned, and others overhauled, whilst a few remain unchanged.

Among the theories that should be overturned absolutely are those handling what is probably called quasi-innovative techniques, together with the Big Bang concept (consisting of the inflationary principle), galaxy formation, dark matter and dark electricity. Why each of those theories will need to be overturned outright can be self-explanatory.

For instance, the Big Bang would be fake because the universe of stars might no longer have originated from a mind-independent force, but as a projection of the mind. Accordingly, technology could haven’t any want to inn to the unconventional inflationary Big Bang principle so that it will account for the prevailing universe of stars. Note here, by the way, that technology does now not stop through in reality announcing “well it’s all within the thoughts, so who cares about something else?” Rather, we look at the celebs and wonder how this specific association appeared within the shape it did: why did the Mind create this unique universe, rather than some other one?

Dark be counted, any other strange principle, additionally is going by way of the wayside. Dark matter is an upload on assumption used to account for the located lack of the essential gravitational mass to keep galaxies — and for that reason the universe — collectively. Dark energy, any other unobservable force, might additionally be useless. This mysterious pressure has been offered as a way to account for the observed extended expansion of the universe. The problem with dark energy, like dark remember, is that scientists can not have a look at a bodily source for the repulsive pressure. But again, if the universe is mind-created, the fact that a ways away galaxies appear like drifting away at an expanded pace may display, among different things, the mind in a steady nation of advent, or in truth nothing in any respect.

Now the point here, it need to be remembered, isn’t (yet) to show that in reality the arena is a dream, however to dispose of any resistance in opposition to “dream-idea” primarily based on a fear that technological know-how can now not be practiced. No such component happens. Instead, viewing the sector as a dream sincerely eliminates a few of the useless assumptions of modern-day science and dispenses with its maximum bizarre theories.

In addition to getting rid of materialism’s starting-of-the-global theories, dream-concept also removes materialism’s give up-of-the world theories. These theories are based totally upon the sun jogging out of gasoline and death, the universe reversing its expansion and retracting right into a Big Crunch, or some other principle modeled after an getting old gadget. Now, if the arena is instead mind-created, the “out-of-gas” scenario is not legitimate because the sun and different stars inside the sky are in the long run fueled with the aid of the thoughts’s desire to stay and dream, now not with the aid of the quantity of hydrogen in the superstar’s middle.

Medical technology is any other subject of fabric science that will ought to go through dramatic amendment if the world turns out to be a dream. This one we ought to have a good time over. As stated, the underlying assumption of fabric technological know-how is that the bodily global exists out of doors of the mind and operates past its control. This intended unbiased physical international includes the human frame. As most people know, scientific science, opposite to pretty a whole lot of evidence, assumes that the human frame operates on its own accord and is unaffected by way of any high quality or poor notion within the mind. This is why science tells us that no matter how an awful lot we accept as true with otherwise, we are doomed to wrinkle and die; and, of route, if the human body is a gadget impartial of the thoughts, this wondering is possibly proper.

But if the sector is a dream, then the complete bodily world, together with the human frame, could be a projection of the mind, and therefore managed in the long run by means of the thoughts. This simple truth might explain the workings of the “powerful placebo,” and the long history — even though more often than not anecdotal — of the way robust perception heals.

Now on this factor, one could need to question why a cloth scientist, and for that depend anybody, might at the least no longer bear in mind the truth of dream theory. Like Pascal’s famous guess that it is higher to trust in God than no longer, simply in case one genuinely exists, so one would possibly want to location a few chips on the distance marked “dream theory” just in case the arena actually is a dream. Upon further idea, it would even be wiser to move “all in” on dream concept, because the rewards can also thoroughly be restricted most effective with the aid of the creativeness.

So technology can indeed still be practiced if the sector is genuinely a dream. Therefore, if the main (possibly unstated) cause you have got rejected the concept that this world may be a dream is because science would end to exist, then a few reconsideration is essential. It seems higher to construct a worldview upon the suitable metaphysics and then carry out science, in preference to to count on one should believe in an misguided global model because the charge for wearing out a logical, systematic, objective have a look at of the world.